“A fighting force both consistent and compassionate on a scale’s a 5 all around.”
Rachael Hall
✦ Certified Specialist in Workers’ Compensation Law — Certified by the State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization ✦
Your employer cannot punish you for getting hurt. If they did, we’ll make them pay.
By Eman Yazdchi, Esq. · Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law, State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
In California, a California City employer who fires, demotes, or otherwise punishes a worker for filing a workers' compensation claim violates Labor Code §132a, which provides reinstatement, lost wages, and a $10,000 increase in compensation. Yazdchi Law is a Certified Specialist firm and prosecutes these petitions at the Bakersfield WCAB. Request a free case review.
California City retaliation cases cluster around the industries that drive the desert caseload. Proving-grounds employers — Hyundai, Honda, Volvo — sometimes terminate long-tenure ground crews who file cumulative-trauma claims after years of repetitive test-equipment handling. The California City Correctional Facility, a private prison, sometimes retaliates against corrections officers who file California Labor Code §3212.5 presumption claims for cardiovascular, hernia, or blood-borne-disease injuries through reassignment, scheduling, or write-up sequences. Borax-area contractor employers sometimes terminate maintenance workers who report respiratory exposures or heat illness. City-services and Galileo Hill operators sometimes retaliate against facilities staff who file lifting-injury claims.
California Labor Code California Labor Code §132a prohibits each of these patterns. The statute bars discrimination against a worker who files or intends to file a workers' compensation claim. Remedies include reinstatement to the pre-discrimination position, payment of all lost wages and work benefits, an increase in compensation of $10,000, and costs and expenses up to $250. The companion section California Labor Code §244 bars a California City employer from threatening to use a worker's immigration status as retaliation for exercising labor rights — a critical protection for a share of the California City contractor and maintenance workforce.
Yazdchi Law's office at 1125 W Avenue M-14, Suite A in Palmdale sits about 35 miles south of California City via the 14. The firm does not maintain a California City satellite. Eman Yazdchi appears at the Bakersfield district WCAB on §132a retaliation petitions and is a Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law, certified by the California Board of Legal Specialization, State Bar of California.
A California City §132a retaliation claim runs on three California Labor Code sections: California Labor Code §132a (the anti-retaliation statute and remedies), California Labor Code §244 (the no-ICE-threat companion), and California Labor Code §5814 (the 25% penalty on unreasonably delayed benefits, often a parallel claim in §132a fact patterns). This page sits within our broader California retaliation remedies framework practice. Statute deep-dive: California Labor Code §132a (anti-retaliation).
Under California Labor Code §132a, a California City employer may not discharge, threaten to discharge, or in any manner discriminate against a worker because the worker filed or intends to file a workers' compensation claim, received a rating or award, or testified in any workers' compensation proceeding. Typical California City §132a fact patterns include termination shortly after a DWC-1 filing, demotion or unfavorable reassignment after a return-to-work request, refusal to reinstate after a temporary disability period, and punitive scheduling against a corrections officer or proving-grounds ground-crew member who reported an injury. The statute reaches any "manner" of discrimination.
Under California Labor Code §132a, a California City worker who proves discrimination recovers four remedies. First, reinstatement to the pre-discrimination position. Second, payment of all lost wages and work benefits caused by the discrimination. Third, an increase in compensation of $10,000 — added to the underlying workers' comp award. Fourth, costs and expenses up to $250. The remedies are cumulative; the worker recovers all four on proof. The §132a petition is litigated at the Bakersfield district WCAB, separately from the underlying workers' comp claim though typically on a parallel calendar.
Under California Labor Code §244, a California City employer may not threaten to use a worker's immigration status as retaliation for exercising labor rights, including the right to file a workers' compensation claim under California Labor Code §3351. The protection applies regardless of the worker's actual immigration status. A California City Borax-area contractor, proving-grounds support employer, or city-services operator who threatens to "call ICE" or "report your status" after a worker files a §132a petition violates §244 in addition to §132a. California Labor Code §3351 confirms that California workers' compensation reaches every employee regardless of immigration status.
Under California Labor Code §5814, when a California City workers' comp insurer unreasonably delays or denies a benefit, a 25% penalty attaches to that delayed benefit. On a §132a retaliation file, the §5814 penalty is often a parallel claim — when the employer or insurer froze temporary disability under California Labor Code §4653 after the §132a-protected activity, or refused to authorize treatment under California Labor Code §4600. The §5814 penalty applies per benefit unreasonably delayed, and the §132a $10,000 increase applies on top.
Injured at work in California City? Call (661) 273-1780
Tap to call →California City §132a retaliation petitions are heard at the Bakersfield district office of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the only WCAB in Kern County. Yazdchi Law regularly appears at the Bakersfield WCAB on §132a petitions in proving-grounds, corrections, Borax-area, and city-services matters. Related coverage: California City workers' comp settlements.
A successful California City §132a petition is built on temporal proximity between the DWC-1 filing (or other §132a-protected activity) and the adverse employment action, plus documentary evidence of the activity-action chain — text messages, supervisor emails, write-up sequences, attendance records, scheduling sheets. Anti-retaliation cases are stronger when the worker's pre-injury performance record was strong and the post-injury "discipline" was pretextual. The California Division of Workers' Compensation publishes the §132a petition form online. Related coverage: California City back-injury workers' comp claims.
A California City §132a petition is litigated at the Bakersfield WCAB, but a wrongful-termination-in-violation-of-public-policy civil claim may run in parallel in superior court for the same fact pattern. The civil claim reaches damages — emotional distress, punitive — outside the §132a $10,000 cap. The civil claim's exclusive-remedy bar under California Labor Code §3601 does not extinguish a public-policy wrongful-termination claim. California City retaliation files often run on both tracks.
Last reviewed by Eman Yazdchi, Esq., May 2026.
Ready to discuss your case? Schedule a free consultation.
Schedule Free ConsultationRead more testimonials →“A fighting force both consistent and compassionate on a scale’s a 5 all around.”