Skip to main content

✦ Certified Specialist in Workers’ Compensation Law, certified by the State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization ✦

Can I Get a Second Opinion After a QME?

Certified Specialist (CA Bar)No Fee Unless We Win (Costs May Apply)Millions RecoveredSe Habla Español
Years of Practice
14+
Cases Handled
500+
over 14+ years of practice
Recovered
$7M+
over 14+ years of practice
Bilingual + Farsi
English + Español + Farsi

By Eman Yazdchi, Esq. · Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law, State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization · Cal Bar #285231

A bad QME report can feel like the case turned against you in one envelope. The doctor may have missed your job duties, mixed up your history, or blamed your pain on age. That does not mean you can simply shop for another QME. California workers compensation has strict rules for medical-legal opinions.

The short answer is this: you may be able to challenge a QME report, but the path is usually correction, added evidence, a supplemental report, or attorney review. In some cases a replacement panel or new evaluator may be possible. In many cases it is not. Labor Code §4062.1 and Labor Code §4062.2 control much of the QME panel process.

Can You Get a New QME After a Bad Report?

A new QME is not automatic. Most workers must first challenge the report through corrections, records, or follow-up questions.

California does not treat the QME process like a normal second opinion at a clinic. A QME is a medical-legal evaluator. The report may affect whether your injury is accepted, how much permanent disability you have, what part is work related, and what future care you may need.

If the report is weak, ask why. Did the doctor get a fact wrong? Did the doctor ignore a record? Did the doctor use the wrong body part, job title, or date of injury? Each problem has a different fix.

What Counts as a True Second Opinion?

Your treating doctor can give another medical view, but that does not always replace the QME report in the legal case.

Your primary treating physician still matters. That doctor can keep treating you, write reports, respond to the QME, and explain why the report missed something important. The treating doctor may disagree about work causation, work limits, permanent disability, or future care.

That opinion can help when it is tied to records, exam findings, and a clear work history. But it is not the same as a new QME panel. A judge may still weigh the QME report as medical-legal evidence.

If your case has an AME, the limit is often tighter. An agreed medical evaluator is chosen by both sides. The report can still be questioned, but replacing that evaluator is usually harder.

How Do Supplemental Reports Work?

A supplemental report asks the same evaluator to answer new questions, review new records, or correct a weak opinion.

A supplemental report is often the main tool after a QME. It can ask the doctor to review records that were not available before. It can ask the doctor to explain a rating, address a treating physician report, or explain why part of the disability was blamed on non-work causes.

Under California QME regulations, a supplemental report is generally due within 60 days after a proper written request. The parties may agree to a short extension. The request should be focused. A careful letter can expose the gap.

What If the QME Got Facts Wrong?

Factual errors should be raised fast. Wrong job duties, dates, records, or symptoms can change the whole medical opinion.

Compare the report to your records. Check your job description, injury date, body parts, prior symptoms, MRI findings, and work limits. Also check whether the QME listed all records reviewed.

For an unrepresented worker, a factual correction request usually has a 30-day window after receipt of the report. If you have a lawyer, talk to the lawyer right away. The lawyer may use a supplemental letter, deposition notice, or objection instead.

Do not send private messages to the QME. Medical-legal communication has rules. Written letters and records usually must be served on the other side.

When Can a Replacement Panel Happen?

A replacement panel may be possible for process problems, distance, delay, conflicts, or invalid selection, not mere disagreement.

A replacement panel is not a do-over because the opinion was bad. It is usually tied to a procedural problem. Examples may include a QME who cannot schedule within the required time, a conflict of interest, a panel issued in the wrong specialty, or a selection process that did not follow the rules.

Timing matters. Unrepresented workers often have 10 days to select a QME from the panel and make the appointment. If that deadline is missed, the claims administrator may gain control over the choice.

When Should You Get Legal Review?

Get legal review fast if the QME report affects denial, disability rating, apportionment, work limits, surgery, or future care.

A QME report can shape the whole claim. It may affect temporary disability, permanent disability, medical treatment, future medical care, settlement talks, and trial. If the report says your injury is not work related, or says most of your disability came from age or prior problems, do not wait.

Legal review should look at the report, the records sent to the evaluator, the job facts, and the missed issues. It should also check whether a deposition can help. At a deposition, the QME answers questions under oath.

Eman Yazdchi is a Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law, California Board of Legal Specialization, State Bar of California. Yazdchi Law reviews QME and AME problems for injured workers in California. You can call (661) 273-1780 to discuss the report, the deadlines, and the next step.

Problem after QMEPossible responseTiming issue
Wrong factsCorrection request or attorney letterOften 30 days for unrepresented workers
Missing recordsSupplemental report requestReport generally due in 60 days
Treating doctor disagreesUse treating report or targeted questionsAct before trial or settlement
Bad panel processReplacement panel requestSelection deadlines can be short

Injured at work? Call (661) 273-1780

Tap to call →

This is a California statewide workers compensation issue, not a city-only rule. The right next step depends on whether you are represented, whether the evaluator was a QME or AME, what deadline is still open, and what issue the report decides. Keep the envelope, proof of service, report, treating doctor notes, and letters sent to the evaluator.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I pick another QME if I do not like the first report?

Usually no. Disliking the result is not enough. You may need a factual correction request, supplemental report, deposition, or legal objection.

Can my treating doctor disagree with the QME?

Yes. Your treating doctor can write opinions about diagnosis, work limits, causation, disability, and treatment. That report may help challenge the QME.

What is the deadline to correct factual errors?

For many unrepresented workers, the deadline is 30 days after receiving the QME report. Represented workers should ask counsel right away.

What is a supplemental QME report?

It is a follow-up report from the same evaluator. It may address new records, missed facts, unclear reasoning, rating issues, or future care.

Can I send records directly to the QME?

Be careful. Medical-legal records and letters usually have service rules. Sending material the wrong way can create a new dispute.

Does an AME make a second opinion harder?

Often, yes. An AME is chosen by agreement. The report can still be questioned, corrected, or tested in deposition.

What if the QME blames my injury on age?

That issue is apportionment. The evaluator should explain the medical basis and connect it to disability, not just imaging.

When should I call a lawyer about a QME report?

Call quickly if the report denies work causation, cuts off disability, assigns high apportionment, blocks care, or seems factually wrong.

Last reviewed by Eman Yazdchi, Esq., June 2026.

Get your case evaluated in 60 seconds.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation

Talk to a Certified Specialist

Three fields. No obligation.

What Our Clients Say

Eman at Yazdchi Law was extremely professional, responsive, and supportive at all times. He and his staff exceeded all of my expectations.

Andrea Dalessandro

A fighting force both consistent and compassionate on a scale’s a 5 all around.

Rachael Hall

Eman at Yazdchi Law was extremely professional, responsive, and supportive at all times. He and his staff exceeded all of my expectations.

Andrea D.
Read more testimonials →