“Eman at Yazdchi Law was extremely professional, responsive, and supportive at all times. He and his staff exceeded all of my expectations.”
Andrea Dalessandro
✦ Certified Specialist in Workers’ Compensation Law — Certified by the State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization ✦
By Eman Yazdchi, Esq. · Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law, State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization · Cal Bar #285231
Three clocks start when the order arrives: twenty days to file the Petition for Reconsideration, twenty-five if served by mail, then forty-five days for the Writ of Review.
An Irvine worker has 20 days to file a Petition for Reconsideration and 25 more days to take a Writ of Review. Irvine Company tech-campus, UC Irvine Medical Center, and Orange County biotech and aerospace files are heard at the Long Beach district WCAB. Certified Specialist Eman Yazdchi (California Board of Legal Specialization, State Bar of California) prepares the Petition and the writ.
Irvine's caseload produces appellable orders in the most contested categories: California Labor Code §4663 — the apportionment rule that splits disability between work and non-work causes — apportionment fights in longtime tech and biotech workers, California Labor Code §4660 — the permanent disability rating schedule — rating errors, denied medical treatment under California Labor Code §4600 — the employer's duty to provide all medically required treatment, and California Labor Code §4553 — the serious-and-willful penalty — misconduct petitions. The §5903 grounds are the statutory basis for every Petition. Call (661) 273-1780.
The Petition is filed at the Long Beach district WCAB through EAMS, then transmitted to the seven-member Appeals Board in San Francisco for review within sixty days.
A Petition for Reconsideration is the only path to challenge a Long Beach WCAB judge's decision on an Irvine case. The petition is decided on the existing record, by the WCAB en banc panel in San Francisco, and the standard for grant is whether the judge's decision was supported by substantial evidence in light of the entire record. The grounds for reconsideration are limited to those listed in California Labor Code §5903.
California Labor Code §5903 lists five grounds: (a) the WCAB acted without or in excess of its powers; (b) the order was procured by fraud; (c) the evidence does not justify the findings of fact; (d) the petitioner discovered new evidence material to the petitioner, which could not, with reasonable diligence, have been produced at the hearing; and (e) the findings of fact do not support the order. An Irvine apportionment appeal usually proceeds under §5903(c) (the evidence does not justify the apportionment percentage) or §5903(e) (the findings do not support the order). A new-evidence appeal under §5903(d) is rare and requires a sworn declaration explaining the diligence problem.
California Labor Code §5903 sets the deadline at 25 days from the date the decision is mailed by the Long Beach district office. Effective for decisions served electronically through EAMS, the deadline is 20 days from electronic service. The deadlines are jurisdictional — a one-day-late filing strips the WCAB en banc panel of jurisdiction and is dismissed without consideration of the merits. The verified deadline rule is 25 days mailed, 20 days electronic, never 30. An Irvine worker who misses the deadline loses the right to appeal that decision permanently.
The WCAB en banc panel reviews the underlying trial record from the Long Beach district office and either grants or denies reconsideration. A grant is rare — published WCAB statistics show fewer than 15% of petitions are granted. A denial leaves the trial judge's decision intact and exhausts the workers' compensation administrative process. A grant produces a new decision (which can itself be challenged in the appellate courts under the writ-of-review path described below). For an Irvine worker, the most common outcome is denial of reconsideration followed by a strategic call about whether the writ-of-review path under California Labor Code §5950 is worth pursuing.
After the WCAB en banc panel denies reconsideration — or grants it and issues a new decision the worker still disagrees with — the next step is a writ of review filed in the California Court of Appeal under California Labor Code §5950. The writ must be filed within 45 days of the WCAB's final decision; the standard of review is whether the WCAB acted in excess of its powers, the order was procured by fraud, the order was unreasonable, or the findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Writ-of-review filings are rare and have a low grant rate — the Court of Appeal typically denies them summarily — but for a high-value Irvine apportionment or extraordinary-injury case the writ is the only path to appellate-court review.
Related on yazdchilaw.com: California workers' comp appeal pillar guide · Tustin workers' comp appeal · Newport Beach workers' comp appeal · Irvine workers' comp lawyer · California Labor Code §5903 (Petition for Reconsideration deadline).
Three deadlines drive every California workers' comp appeal: 20 days (electronic) or 25 days (mail service) for a §5900 Petition for Reconsideration; 30 days for a §4610.5 IMR appeal of a Utilization Review treatment denial; 25 days from the reconsideration denial for a §5950 Writ of Review to the California Court of Appeal.
Under California Labor Code §5903 a Petition for Reconsideration must rest on one of six specific grounds — (a) the appeals board acted without or in excess of its powers; (b) the order, decision, or award was procured by fraud; (c) the evidence does not justify the findings of fact; (d) the petitioner discovered new evidence that could not, with reasonable diligence, have been produced at hearing; (e) the findings of fact do not support the order, decision, or award; (f) any other matter required by law. A verified Petition for Reconsideration must be signed under penalty of perjury and served on every party and lien claimant on the same day it is filed with the appeals board.
The Petition is filed at the Long Beach WCAB district where the underlying Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) ruling was issued, then transmitted to the seven-member Workers' Compensation Appeals Board in San Francisco for review. After filing, the assigned trial-WCJ prepares a Report and Recommendation on Reconsideration; the appeals board then issues a written decision either granting the petition (which usually orders a rehearing on a defined issue, sometimes en banc) or denying it. If the petition is denied, the only remaining remedy is a §5950 Writ of Review to the California Court of Appeal — a discretionary writ the court may grant or summarily deny within 60 days.
Injured at work? Call (661) 273-1780
Tap to call →Irvine appeals are e-filed through EAMS to the Long Beach district WCAB; writ review is handled by the California Court of Appeal for the relevant appellate district.
The Long Beach district office of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board is the trial-court venue for Irvine cases on Yazdchi Law's calendar — the underlying Findings & Award or Findings & Order that gets appealed is issued by a Long Beach WCAB judge. The Petition for Reconsideration is filed through the EAMS electronic-filing system; the original record stays at the Long Beach district office while the en banc panel reviews it.
Irvine's appeal-heavy disputes track the city's industries: apportionment fights under California Labor Code §4663 when the carrier's expert blames degenerative disc disease for an Irvine cumulative-trauma claim; permanent disability rating disputes under California Labor Code §4660 when the AMA Guides 5th Edition WPI is contested; medical-treatment fights under California Labor Code §4600 when a Long Beach judge sides with the carrier's QME over the treating physician; and serious-and-willful misconduct petitions under California Labor Code §4553 when the underlying safety violation is contested.
Recurring Irvine-area employers in the firm's reconsideration files include Edwards Lifesciences, Allergan/AbbVie, Broadcom, Blizzard Entertainment legacy, the UCI Health system, and the Irvine Spectrum retail cluster. Self-insured employers and the larger national carriers are the most aggressive on reconsideration — they have in-house appellate counsel and they file defensively when an Irvine worker wins at trial. The firm's job is to write the answer brief that holds the trial judge's findings together.
Emergency-department records from Hoag Hospital Irvine, UCI Medical Center in Orange, and Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center are routinely the most decisive evidence in an Irvine apportionment appeal — contemporaneous treating-physician documentation that places the injury at work, before any QME spin, before any carrier-attorney cross-examination. Preserving and citing those records in the answer brief is often what holds the trial-court decision on reconsideration.
Last reviewed by Eman Yazdchi, Esq., June 2026.
Get your case evaluated in 60 seconds.
Get Your Free Case EvaluationThree fields. No obligation.
Read more testimonials →“Eman at Yazdchi Law was extremely professional, responsive, and supportive at all times. He and his staff exceeded all of my expectations.”