Maywood Workers' Comp Retaliation Lawyer

**How Maywood workers' comp retaliation cases work** California Labor Code §132a is the single most important worker-protection statute in workers' compensation. It makes it unlawful for any employer to "discharge, or threaten to discharge, or in any manner discriminate against any employee because he or she has filed or made known his or her intention to file a claim for compensation." The penalty is severe: increased compensation of up to 50% (but not more than $10,000), reinstatement with back wages and lost work benefits, and any other remedies the WCAB deems appropriate. **§3550 — the notice requirement** §3550 requires every California employer to post a workers' comp notice in a conspicuous place at the worksite and to provide a DWC-1 Claim Form within one working day of notice of injury. Failure to provide the DWC-1 is itself a misdemeanor under §3550 and is often the first evidence in a §132a case — when the employer never provided the form, never posted the notice, and then disciplined the worker, the pattern is clear. **The §132a one-year statute of limitations** §132a petitions must be filed within one year of the discriminatory act. The one-year clock starts on the date of the adverse action — typically the termination date, the demotion date, or the date the worker received the disciplinary write-up. A State Bar Certified Specialist will frequently file the §132a petition simultaneously with the underlying workers' comp claim, because the discovery in one case feeds the other (California Board of Legal Specialization, State Bar of California). **What counts as retaliation under §132a** The case law under §132a — particularly *Lauher v. WCAB* (2003) — requires the worker to show a causal connection between the workers' comp claim and the adverse employment action. Examples that have succeeded include: termination within weeks of a DWC-1 filing; demotion after a return-to-work request with restrictions; refusal to provide modified duty under §4658.7 when the doctor released the worker with restrictions; harassment campaigns documented through emails and witness statements; and pretextual "performance" terminations where the worker had years of positive reviews before the injury. **Damages under §132a** The 50% increase applies to all compensation owed under the underlying workers' comp claim — temporary disability, permanent disability, and life pension. The reinstatement remedy under §132a is rare in practice because most workers do not want to return to a hostile employer, but the lost wages remedy from the date of termination through the trial date can be substantial. According to the California Division of Workers' Compensation 2024 caseload data, §132a petitions are filed in approximately 2-3% of California workers' comp cases. The WCIRB California 2024 State of the System Report notes that retaliation and discrimination findings substantially increase the total cost of a claim once the 50% increase is applied. WCAB Los Angeles hears all Maywood §132a petitions, and the venue handles a steady volume of discrimination claims from the surrounding LA County workforce. **The interaction with FEHA and Title VII** A §132a petition is a workers' comp remedy, but the same facts often support a parallel civil case for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, FEHA disability discrimination, and FMLA/CFRA interference. The §132a case stays at WCAB. The civil case is filed in Los Angeles Superior Court. Coordination between the two is important — admissions in one proceeding can affect the other. Call (661) 273-1780 before the one-year deadline.

Related on yazdchilaw.com: California §132a workers' comp retaliation pillar · Lynwood workers' comp retaliation · Lakewood workers' comp retaliation · Maywood workers' comp lawyer · California Labor Code §132a (workers' comp retaliation).