“Very thankful for everything they did for us. Always responsive, reassured us every step of the way and obtained a great result.”
Miguel Orellana
✦ Certified Specialist in Workers’ Compensation Law — Certified by the State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization ✦
Serving injured workers across California. Board-certified specialist; no fee unless we win.
By Eman Yazdchi, Esq. · Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law, State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
In California, Labor Code §132a makes it illegal for an employer to fire, demote, or cut the hours of a worker for filing a workers' compensation claim. Remedies include reinstatement, lost wages, and a $10,000 increase in compensation. Yazdchi Law, a Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law firm, handles §132a petitions. Request a free case review.
An injured California worker fights through a denied claim, makes it to a settlement, and then loses the job. Sometimes the firing is dressed up as "performance issues" two weeks after the injury. Sometimes it is a sudden schedule cut. Sometimes the worker is simply told not to come back. Whatever the form, retaliation for filing a workers' compensation claim is illegal in California — and the remedies are real.
This guide explains what California Labor Code §132a actually protects, what the worker has to prove, what remedies the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board can order, and how a §132a petition actually gets litigated alongside the underlying claim. It is written for a worker who has just been fired, demoted, or pushed out after filing a claim and is trying to figure out what to do next.
The short version: timing is often the strongest evidence. A worker who was on the schedule yesterday and got fired today after reporting an injury has a §132a case that is hard for the employer to explain away. Documentation makes the case win or lose.
California Labor Code §132a prohibits an employer from discriminating against a worker because the worker filed or intends to file a workers' compensation claim, testified or intends to testify in another worker's proceeding, or received workers' compensation benefits. The statute makes the retaliation a misdemeanor and creates a private right of action that is heard at the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board — not in civil court.
The protected activity is broad. It covers a worker who actually filed a DWC-1, a worker who merely reported an injury to a supervisor under California Labor Code §5400, a worker who sought medical treatment for a work injury, and a worker who testified at a coworker's WCAB hearing. The retaliation does not have to be a firing — any adverse action that affects the terms or conditions of employment counts.
To prevail on a §132a petition at the WCAB, the worker must prove three elements:
The worker filed a workers' compensation claim, reported an injury under California Labor Code §5400, sought medical treatment for a work injury under California Labor Code §4600, testified in a workers' compensation proceeding, or otherwise exercised a right protected under California workers' compensation law. The activity does not have to be formal — verbally reporting an injury to a supervisor is enough to trigger the protection.
The employer took an action that negatively affected the worker's terms or conditions of employment. Common examples: termination, demotion, reduction in hours, transfer to a less desirable position, hostile work environment created after the claim, refusal to provide reasonable modified or light-duty work, sudden negative performance reviews that did not exist before the injury, and constructive termination — making conditions so intolerable that the worker is forced to resign.
The adverse action was motivated, at least in part, by the worker's workers' compensation claim or injury. Direct evidence (a supervisor's recorded statement, an email expressing frustration with the cost of the claim) is rare. Causation is usually proved by circumstantial evidence: timing (the closer the adverse action to the protected activity, the stronger the inference), pattern (other employees who filed claims were treated similarly), pretext (the employer's stated reason does not hold up under scrutiny), and statements by supervisors or managers about the claim.
Unlike most employment discrimination claims that are filed in civil court, a California §132a claim is heard at the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board — typically at the same district office handling the underlying workers' compensation case. The judge is a Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge, not a jury. The standard of proof is "preponderance of the evidence" — more likely than not. Discovery is more limited than civil litigation but still includes subpoenas, depositions, and document requests.
The §132a petition is usually filed alongside the underlying claim, so both move through the WCAB on the same calendar. After trial, if the worker disagrees with the Findings and Award on the §132a issue, a Petition for Reconsideration can be filed within 25 days of service by mail (or 20 days from electronic service) under California Labor Code §5903.
If the worker prevails on a §132a petition, the WCAB can order four categories of remedies:
The employer can be ordered to put the worker back in the position the worker held before the retaliation. In practice, reinstatement is sometimes impractical when the relationship has broken down — but the right to reinstatement gives the worker leverage in settlement negotiations.
The worker is entitled to all wages and benefits lost as a result of the adverse action — base pay, overtime, health insurance contributions, retirement contributions, and other employment benefits — from the date of the adverse action through the date of resolution.
Under §132a, the WCAB can order an increase in the worker's compensation award of up to $10,000 as a penalty against the employer. This is in addition to back pay and is intended to deter employers from retaliating against injured workers.
The employer can be ordered to pay reasonable costs and expenses associated with the §132a petition, including attorney's fees for the retaliation portion of the case, capped at $250 under the statute.
California Labor Code §3351 extends California workers' compensation protections — including §132a — to every worker regardless of immigration status. California Labor Code §244 prohibits an employer from threatening to report a worker's immigration status as retaliation for exercising labor rights, including for filing a workers' compensation claim. A §132a petition can be filed regardless of the worker's documentation status, and the employer cannot use immigration status as a defense.
Injured at work? Call (661) 273-1780
Tap to call →A worker who suspects retaliation has limited time to act. Evidence disappears, witnesses move on, and the longer the worker waits, the harder the timing-based inference becomes. The three priorities are documentation, written follow-up, and a free consultation with a specialist.
Dates, times, what was said, who was present. Save every email, text message, performance review, schedule, pay stub, and written communication from the employer about the claim or work status. If a supervisor said something verbally that felt retaliatory, follow up with an email confirming what was said. The written follow-up creates the paper trail. Pre-injury performance reviews showing good performance are critical evidence against pretext.
If the employer is making work life difficult to pressure the worker into quitting, quitting can complicate the §132a claim — though it does not defeat it if the worker can prove constructive termination. Before resigning, the worker should consult an attorney. The right move is sometimes to stay in the role while documenting, then let the employer make the firing decision on a clear record.
California workers' compensation attorneys work on contingency under California Labor Code §4906 — typically 15% of any eventual settlement, paid only if the case recovers. A free consultation costs the worker nothing, and a Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law, certified by the California Board of Legal Specialization, State Bar of California, can evaluate the §132a facts against the timeline of the underlying claim. Yazdchi Law handles §132a petitions alongside the underlying workers' compensation case from the firm's office in Palmdale.
Last reviewed by Eman Yazdchi, Esq., May 2026.
Ready to discuss your case? Schedule a free consultation.
Schedule Free ConsultationRead more testimonials →“Very thankful for everything they did for us. Always responsive, reassured us every step of the way and obtained a great result.”