“Eman at Yazdchi Law was extremely professional, responsive, and supportive at all times. He and his staff exceeded all of my expectations.”
Andrea Dalessandro
✦ Certified Specialist in Workers’ Compensation Law, certified by the State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization ✦
By Eman Yazdchi, Esq. · Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law, State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization · Cal Bar #285231
Any person aggrieved directly or indirectly... may petition the appeals board for reconsideration.
Labor Code 5900 is the doorway statute for WCAB reconsideration after a final order, decision, or award.
When a workers' compensation judge issues a final decision, the losing side does not automatically get a new trial. Labor Code 5900 gives an aggrieved person the right to ask the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board to reconsider matters decided by that final order, decision, or award.
The statute is about access to review. It does not list every ground or give unlimited time. The petition must comply with the procedure in the same chapter, especially Labor Code 5903.
The first question is whether the decision is final enough to affect a substantial right. A simple setting order may not qualify. If the order only sets a date, it may not be final. If it decides injury, money, credit, or a lien, it may be final enough for review. Eman Yazdchi is a Certified Specialist in workers' compensation law, certified by the California Board of Legal Specialization, State Bar of California.
An aggrieved person is someone directly or indirectly affected by the final WCAB decision.
The injured worker is the most obvious example. An employer, insurer, lien claimant, or other party can also be aggrieved if the final decision affects that party's rights or duties. The petition should explain how the decision harms the petitioner.
Being annoyed with the reasoning is not enough. The order must determine or cover something that matters in the case, such as injury, benefits, credit, penalties, liens, or disability.
Start with harm. What did the order do to the worker's check, care, rating, lien, or right to prove the claim? That answer shapes the petition.
Labor Code 5900 authorizes reconsideration, while Labor Code 5903 supplies the timing and listed grounds.
Read the two statutes together. Labor Code 5900 opens the door. Labor Code 5903 tells the party when and on what grounds to walk through it. A petition that cites Labor Code 5900 but ignores Labor Code 5903 is incomplete.
Current Labor Code 5903 grounds include excess powers, fraud, unsupported evidence, new material evidence that could not reasonably have been produced earlier, and findings that do not support the order.
The petition should identify the final decision, the challenged findings, the statutory ground, and the record support.
The Appeals Board is reviewing a record, not starting over from scratch. A useful petition names the decision, states why the petitioner is aggrieved, identifies the ground for reconsideration, and cites the trial evidence or legal error.
For new evidence, the petition needs more than a late medical report. It must explain why the evidence is material and why reasonable diligence could not have produced it before.
The Appeals Board can deny reconsideration, grant it, amend the decision, rescind it, or return the case for more proceedings.
After the petition is filed, the workers' compensation judge may prepare a report. The board reviews the petition, any answer, the record, and the report. If the petition is granted, the final outcome may change or the case may be sent back for more evidence or findings.
Labor Code 5900 also gives the board an own-motion power within a limited period after a judge's order, decision, or award and report. That power is separate from a party's petition.
Injured at work? Call (661) 273-1780
Tap to call →Last reviewed by Eman Yazdchi, Esq., July 2026.
Get your case evaluated in 60 seconds.
Get Your Free Case EvaluationThree fields. No obligation.
Read more testimonials →“Eman at Yazdchi Law was extremely professional, responsive, and supportive at all times. He and his staff exceeded all of my expectations.”