“A fighting force both consistent and compassionate on a scale’s a 5 all around.”
Rachael Hall
✦ Certified Specialist in Workers’ Compensation Law, certified by the State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization ✦
Por Eman Yazdchi, Esq. · Especialista Certificado en Derecho de Compensación Laboral, State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization · Cal Bar #285231
132a.
It is the declared policy of this state that there should not be discrimination against workers who are injured in the course and scope of their employment.
(1) Any employer who discharges, or threatens to discharge, or in any manner discriminates against any employee because he or she has filed or made known his or her intention to file a claim for compensation with his or her employer or an application for adjudication, or because the employee has received a rating, award, or settlement, is guilty of a misdemeanor and the employee’s compensation shall be increased by one-half, but in no event more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), together with costs and expenses not in excess of two hundred fifty dollars ($250). Any such employee shall also be entitled to reinstatement and reimbursement for lost wages and work benefits caused by the acts of the employer.
(2) Any insurer that advises, directs, or threatens an insured under penalty of cancellation or a raise in premium or for any other reason, to discharge an employee because he or she has filed or made known his or her intention to file a claim for compensation with his or her employer or an application for adjudication, or because the employee has received a rating, award, or settlement, is guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to the increased compensation and costs provided in paragraph (1).
(3) Any employer who discharges, or threatens to discharge, or in any manner discriminates against any employee because the employee testified or made known his or her intentions to testify in another employee’s case before the appeals board, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and the employee shall be entitled to reinstatement and reimbursement for lost wages and work benefits caused by the acts of the employer.
(4) Any insurer that advises, directs, or threatens an insured employer under penalty of cancellation or a raise in premium or for any other reason, to discharge or in any manner discriminate against an employee because the employee testified or made known his or her intention to testify in another employee’s case before the appeals board, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Proceedings for increased compensation as provided in paragraph (1), or for reinstatement and reimbursement for lost wages and work benefits, are to be instituted by filing an appropriate petition with the appeals board, but these proceedings may not be commenced more than one year from the discriminatory act or date of termination of the employee. The appeals board is vested with full power, authority, and jurisdiction to try and determine finally all matters specified in this section subject only to judicial review, except that the appeals board shall have no jurisdiction to try and determine a misdemeanor charge. The appeals board may refer and any worker may complain of suspected violations of the criminal misdemeanor provisions of this section to the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, or directly to the office of the public prosecutor.
(Amended by Stats. 1990, Ch. 1550, Sec. 13.)
En corto: sirve para pedir remedio por castigos ligados al reclamo.
El Código Laboral 132a no reemplaza el reclamo principal. Es una petición adicional. El reclamo principal busca médico, pagos e incapacidad. La petición de represalia busca corregir el castigo laboral que ocurrió porque el trabajador usó el sistema.
Esta página se enfoca en el uso práctico de la petición. La otra página de esta ley explica la regla general. Aquí el punto es cómo se prepara el caso y qué pruebas suelen importar.
En corto: reclamo, castigo y conexión.
Primero, el trabajador debe mostrar actividad protegida. Puede ser presentar DWC-1, avisar intención de reclamar, recibir un premio o testificar. Segundo, debe mostrar acción adversa. Tercero, debe conectar ambas cosas con hechos concretos.
La conexión puede salir de fechas, comentarios, cambios de trato o razones falsas. Un despido dos dias despues de entregar restricciones médicas se mira distinto a una decisión tomada meses antes por documentos claros.
En corto: guarde el expediente laboral, no solo el expediente médico.
Ayudan horarios, mensajes, evaluaciones, cartas de disciplina, talones de pago, restricciones médicas y nombres de testigos. Tambien ayuda probar que antes del reclamo el trabajador recibía horas normales o buen trato. El contraste puede ser fuerte.
No borre mensajes. No entregue el teléfono sin copia. No firme un acuerdo privado que diga que renuncia a todo sin revisión. Una renuncia mal entendida puede complicar el caso.
En corto: el miedo no debe tapar la prueba.
Si el patrón menciona deportación, papeles o ICE, el Código Laboral 244 puede ser relevante. Si el trabajador necesita intérprete, el Código Laboral 5811 puede ayudar. Y el Código Laboral 3351 confirma cobertura sin importar estatus migratorio.
La estrategia debe proteger al trabajador completo. Eso incluye atención médica, ingresos, seguridad familiar, idioma y documentos. La represalia rara vez aparece aislada. Suele venir con presión y confusión.
¿Lesionado en el trabajo? Llame (661) 273-1780
Toque para llamar →En corto: la cronología decide si vale presentar.
Yazdchi Law revisa si los hechos justifican una petición de represalia, qué remedios son realistas y cómo coordinarla con el reclamo principal. Llame al (661) 273-1780.
Eman Yazdchi es Especialista Certificado en Derecho de Compensación Laboral, certificado por la California Board of Legal Specialization, State Bar of California. La protección cubre a trabajadores lesionados sin importar su estatus migratorio.
Última revisión por Eman Yazdchi, Esq., julio de 2026.
Evalúe su caso en 60 segundos, sin compromiso.
Obtenga su Evaluación Gratuita de Caso (sin compromiso)Tres campos. Sin compromiso.
Read more testimonials →“A fighting force both consistent and compassionate on a scale’s a 5 all around.”